Sunday, August 23, 2009
Sunday evening sex post
This is definitely science, and it is almost certainly not safe for work, but who can really say that an MRI image of human intercourse from the inside is not appropriate for this tawdry blog?
CWCID: Ann Althouse, who has Dave Barry's take.
7 Comments:
By 
TigerHawk, at
Sun Aug 23, 08:46:00 PM:
That was such blindingly fast comment spam that I am going to leave it up as a warning to others.
By GreenmanTim, at
Sun Aug 23, 10:27:00 PM:
You mean to say they had to go to the Netherlands to find willing test subjects for this study? What is wrong with good old American coitus? No wonder we are falling behind in math and science...
By Donna B., at
Mon Aug 24, 05:11:00 AM:
I liked the take that this research was the most exceptional response to a couple of techs taking advantage of the MRI machine.
I wish I could remember where I read that first.
By 
, at
Mon Aug 24, 08:52:00 AM:
And thus we advance from copying one's butt on the Xerox machine.
By , at
Mon Aug 24, 02:12:00 PM:
I want a doctor,
To take your picture,
So I can look at from inside as well.
Popular music predicted this moment in science decades ago.
By , at
Mon Aug 24, 07:52:00 PM:
Titillation isn't just what you see, it's the context of where you find it. Whence the success of the SI "cancel my subscription" swimsuit issues.
I felt a (very) small tingle in my leg. Is that wrong?
Link, over
By Simon Kenton, at
Tue Aug 25, 11:31:00 PM:
I noticed with amusement that the good Doctor was awarded an Ignobel prize for this. He is in distinguished company now and forever.
